In Turkey social-economic factors that effects voter's behavior

Political parties are entities that offer public goods and services. Their target is to sell party agenda to voters like a marketer. Voters can also be the consumers of political arena but in contrast to their behaviors in the market, they may become irrational and lead to a political balance that is harmful to him. Social, culturel and economi struture that formats to his political balance. This structure can be decesive for political parties and governments? social, culturel and economic decisions. This study is intend more voter?s voting decesion effect which social and economic factors from political parties? behavior spealicts. Study is a status fixing, not a dynamical analysis. Study that status fixing based, consists of three main parts. In first section, two main actors, voters and political parties, are analyzed theoretically and the relationship between voters and political parties is analyzed. In this section how is going on voting process and worldwide examples, given information about representation system?s provide. In the same time In Turkey, voters and political parties have been conveyed ın organic law. End of this section, information has given in historical process about political parties their votes, governments and governments? time. The second section completes for the first section?s descriptive information. This section, info has given about voting process in Turkey, taken care about voting?s distributions and general view has told with tables and graphics. The facts which effected of voter?s voting decision as age, gender, education, marital status, household Sayı, ownership of house, income level, job, membership of political party, voter?s political trends, when today a voting what will voter do, are voters? votes effected or non effected to the results and what do they think about, how many times did voter vote in past. Current vote, ethical value and visiting voters? house.etc. In the third section all facts which in the second section are analyzed by economic and their cross relation has been showed and commended by cross correlation tables otherwise there is relation between result of crosstabs and voting trends how used SPSS statistical data, the result of variance and Shceffe? analyze. In study?s final chapter, analyze results descendibled, In study, voters are not interested about visiting home that given temporary weal. While voters were voting their political ideas give format their voting trend. This results says that us, if voter?s vote which side of the spectrum, he or she select the same side of the spectrum. And the other result says that, voter votes with social responsibility when search termly, social responsibility is rising. The important result of the study, voters are importanted about political parties?s leader. Representatives are not important for voter. This statue showed us, the general election leader based party is important for voter. Representatives? electoral precinct and their ability is not important for voters. This cause is ?non enough information-. Although ?Non-enough information and leader based vote, generally voters think about ?my vote is effected in the general election?. In Turkey, after 1980?s economic liberation has lived but not political area. The results? cross incoherent with cause of that errors of rationality. Because, in the same time who is consumer as voter. Consumer is sensitive in market but the same person ?voter? is not sensitive in political area.