المقارنة بين منهجي العيني والكشميري في شرحهما لصحيح البخاري في كتاب الزكاة والحج والصوم

This study deals with the approach of the two Imams al-ʿAynī, and al-Kashmīrī on the explanation of Sahih al-Bukhārī, through their books ʿUmdat al-qārī and Fayd al-bārī. The thesis uses the inductive method. However, defining of both Imam at the beginning to be distinguished from the others. The two-Imams stood on the issues on which they agreed, and on some issues on which they have different views.Thus, the thesis attempts to combine the issues on which they have same perspective. For instance, in their use of Hadith terms what are related to the correction and verification of Hadith, criticizing of the narrators and their confirmation.What differed between the al-ʿAynī, on the al-Kashmīrī in this chapter is the commentary of the hadith narrators. This chapter mentions a collection of narrations and an explanation of a strange hadith, examples, stories, and some issues what they agreed. They also agreed with the citations of Qur'anic verses, noble hadiths, and poetic verses. In the hadith jurisprudence, they also agreed in understanding the hadiths and their meaning. However, they cared about the purposes of Sharia and its understanding with the change of time. While from what they agreed on was also mentioning the difference between the jurists and the hadith scholars. Finally, the thesis ends with summarizing the al-ʿAynī,approach alone, and the al-Kashmīrī approach alone as well to be more precise. Key words: Sahih al-Bukhārī, al-ʿAynī, al-Kashmiri, Manhaj, Hadith, Fayd al-bārī.