A solution to the problem of meaning in the post-truth age: Eugene Gendlin and implicit philosophy

The post-truth era refers to a period in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief. This situation raises profound philosophical questions about the nature of meaning, the experience of meaninglessness, and ways to cope with this experience. This thesis examines meaning, meaninglessness, and the philosophy of Eugene Gendlin, including his concept of "felt sense," within the context of the meaning crisis brought about by the post-truth era. The core argument of the thesis is that the post-truth era is closely related to the concepts regarding our relationship with truth throughout the history of philosophy, and in this context, traditional sources of meaning have lost their legitimacy, leading individuals to seek new ways in their quest for meaning. In this search, Gendlin's concept of "felt sense" stands out as a way for individuals to create meaning and cope with feelings of meaninglessness by turning to their own inner experiences. By examining the relationship between meaning, meaninglessness, and Gendlin's philosophy within the context of the meaning crisis of the post-truth era, this thesis aims to offer a new perspective on the search for meaning specific to this era. Gendlin's concept of "felt sense" offers a valuable way for individuals to create meaning and cope with feelings of meaninglessness by turning to their own inner experiences. This thesis is expected to make a significant contribution to the discussions on the nature of meaning in the post-truth era. This summary includes the main outlines and arguments of the thesis. In the full text of the thesis, these issues will be discussed in more detail and references will be made to relevant philosophical discussions.