Clarification and correction of judgement in Administrative Trial Law

As a result of trial process, courts decide in accordance with their results. With this decision, solving disputes between the parties is aimed. It is very important that the decision is clear enough, the rights granted to the parties and the debts incurred are clear and understandable. However, due to the high number of files the judge looks at, the judge's beıng inexperienced or inadvertence, the decision may contain gaps in meaning or contradictional provisions. Legal systems, have envisaged legal solutions in case the decision may not have the minimum qualifications that they should have or if the parties do not meet their expectations. Clarification and correction are two of these solutions. Through clarification and correction, making the judgement more clear and consistent instead of replacing the decision is aimed. The parties of the case may apply to the court if there is contradiction in the judgement or the clarification is not clear enough, and may request the clarification or the elimination of the contradiction. Subject of correction of judgement is simpler than the clarification of judgement. Mistakes related to the name and surname of the parties, designation, request result, and account mistakes in judgement can be changed through correction. The subject of the thesis study is clarification and correction of judgement in administrative trial law. The clarification body is included in the first two sections of the thesis. The last part of the thesis deals with correction of judgement.