Obligation to inform in clinical drug researches

Clinical drug research is essential for the health field in order to develop new treatment modalities. Of course, it may cause problems and new methods should be developed considering these problems. Because the volunteer or volunteers to whom there search will be conducted may benefit or harm due to these studies. For this reason, there are issues to consider between drug research and the rights of the volunteer. The elimination of these issues are possible within the frame work of a group of controls and rules. If these inspections and rules are not followed, the legal and criminal responsibilities of the investigators against the volunteer will be raised. In this study, only legal responsibility arising from drug research is the subject. Although the intervention is intended to protect one's health, it is essentially aimed at body integrity. Illumination is a debt to the physician and a right for the patient. Every intervention of the physician, if the informed consent of the patient is not obtained, it is necessary to enlighten the patient because it causes illegality and the compliance of each medical intervention with the law. Perhaps the most important condition in order for an intervention to be accepted as a lawful medical intervention is the consent of the person to be intervened, that is, the volunteer. The consent of the volunteer, as a means of ensuring the integrity of the body and soul in terms of volunteers and the use of the right to determine their own future, constitutes a requirement of the lawfulness of the intervention and the limit of the authority of the physician. The validity of consent is important in determining the legal relationship between the volunteer and the physician, the legality of the intervention and the responsibility of the physician. Keywords: Clinical Drug Researches, ObligationtoInform, Health Law