Contractual gap fillling
Is this your thesis?
This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.
Abstract (EN)
In Turkish law, the Code of Obligations does not settle the question of how to proceed in the absence of a contractual regulations. A partial solution is derived from CO 2 II, which gives the judge jurisdiction to fill the gaps in accordance with peculiarities of the case, provided that the parties have reached agreement on all essential points of the contract. This provision is inadequate to comprise the power of the judge to complete an incomplete contract. Despite the absence of a legal basis stricto sensu, doctrine and jurisprudence recognize the power of the judge to fill gaps in contracts. The basis of this power of the judge is CC 1 II. When we accept CC 1 II, the legal basis of power of the judge to complete an incomplete contract, we will see that it is inevitable to identify sources of gap filling by CC 1 II.
Author
Mehtap İpek İşleten
Institution
How to Cite
Mehtap İpek İşleten (Doctorate thesis). Contractual gap fillling, 2009, Galatasaray University.
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Galatasaray University
- "Küresel sonlara" karşı yeni anlatılara ve gösterenlere doğru: Şili'nin büyük reddi(2025)
- Natural rights in humanism and transhumanism(2025)
- International state responsibility arising from new space activities(2025)
- Yeni roman: claude simon ve william faulkner(2014)
- Lawful use of data in machine learning-based artificial intelligence under the Turkish law(2021)
- Kentsel dünyanın 3D algısı için derin öğrenme tabanlı tespit ve segmentasyon(2025)
