Consistency at Süleyman Ateş's work named "modern commentary of the Holy Quran

In this study, contemporary interpretations of Süleyman Ateş on some issues that have been discussed for a long time and his discourse on the entry of the People of the Book to paradise were tried to be evaluated in terms of consistency of the work named "Modern Commentary of the Holy Quran", which has been popular since its publication. As a result, it has been determined that this study is consistent in matters such as benefiting from scientific developments, making contemporary comments, expressing your own opinion after giving place to the views of fiqh sects, listing the principles of the Quran derived from the suras, and introducing the suras. On the other hand, it is found as inconsistent in matters such as the word "al-Kitâb", the issue of mentioning the Jews in the Surah of Âl-i Imran, the subject of glorious, the distortion of the Torah, the interpretation of the verses that mention the help of Allah, the word "al-Nâs", intercession, abrogation, issues of Israel, meaning of Qur'an stories, the eternity of the torment, the entry of the People of the Book to paradise, criticism of modernists, isra and ascension, understanding of hadith and translation-interpretation inconsistency.