It crimes in Turkish crime of improperty

Crime of improperty, due to the fact that it is a specific crime, comparison and scope of the civil servant concept used in the old law and the public servant concept, who may be the perpetrator, elements of crime, law provisions, judicial decisions are examined in the light of the discussions in the doctrine. The public servant is punished for abuse of influence and trust obtained from his/her duty and position, when forcing, persuasion, benefit or promise in this direction by benefiting from the fault of the aggrieved, because besides damaging people, it also damages the trust in the public administration. As regulated by law the crime of improperty, not only harms individuals, but also harms the interests of the State. Due to the fact that the improperty crime has similar characteristics and potentially be confused with crimes such as fraud, bribery, embezzlement, extortion and abuse of duty, regarding the seperation aspects of the crime, evaluation has been made in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court. The study is collected under two main headings. Accordingly, in the first part, the concept of public servant and public administration are included, in the second part, the concept of improperty, subject, perpetrator, aggrieved, components, the emergence forms of the crime, procedure, sanction and the relationship of the improperty crime with similar crimes are included. Keywords: Crime of improperty, public servant, perpetrator, aggrieved, subject, components, similar crimes, comparison