Ideal concurrence in perspective of High Court of Appeal's jurisprudence in Turkish law

In this thesis ?ideal concurrence? is examined in perspective of High Court of Appeal?s jurisprudence in the session of Turkish Penal Code the law no. 765 and 5237.?Ideal Concurrence? regualtes the punishment of guilty who commits more than one crime with only one criminal act. This issue which both law no. 765 and 5237 Turkish Penal Code regulate is an exception of the principle of ? for each offence must be a separate criminal sanction?.Although; ?Ideal Concurrence? is examined in this thesis in the perspective of High Court of Appeal?s jurisprudence, it is also examined theorically becasue of the relationship with general crime theory. Therefore, there are also doctrinal explanations under the titles of this thesis when necessary.In this study, ?Ideal Concurrence? is examined in the respect of some problems especially in High Court of Appeal?s jurisprudence and also doctrine. As a result, in this study it is tried to come up with some solutions about the problems.