Elazığ vision-2053 from the perspective of local menagers

This institution is aimed at revealing the common city vision in the administrators and conditions of public and non-governmental organizations operating in Elazig province. This is the expectation and future-oriented of all individuals living in Elazig province for a common future desire with participation and inclusion. It is necessary for its location in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Elazig province and for the once enviable city, but it seems to have lost its superiority. This research is designed for quantitative research approach and is detailed. In this context, under the screening model. Together with the managers and members of non-governmental organizations in Elazig province, as well as managers and organizations of public institutions. 122 scales are available for data collection from 160 scales distributed and returned scales. Scale, which consists of 28 items that can collect data in the research, is for the Elazığ city vision of 2053. Creates a draft scale formula with 25 items under scale development. It was subjected to exploratory factor analysis using 122 return forms. Scale average values are applied arithmetic average and standard deviation over four factors. Opinion discussions are for one-way analysis of variance, which will be according to differentiation and differentiation according to the variable of different civil society organizations. This analysis includes each factor and the items included in the factor for the entire scale. The values according to the mean and standard deviation obtained according to the four factors of the scale are as follows: As an institutional city, the Elazig factor contains five items, and it has been selected to choose 4.143 within five periods. As a modern city, the Elazig factor contains six items and the scale average is used to 4.344 measured. As a livable city, Elazig is 4.148. It is 4.225't. The fourth factor called Elazig as an economic city contains four items and the factor average is 4.225. In the analysis of variance conducted for the first factor, significant differences emerged between the institutions for all questions and scale. While there are significant differences between the representatives of the institution in the four questions and scaling of the second factor, it appears in two questions in a meaningful way. In all questions of the third factor and in the factor average, the mean of views is for significant differences. Finally, all the factors and factors of the fourth factor are in the mean. As a natural consequence of this, a significant difference emerged between the scalable groups. TSO is significantly higher than the views of municipalities, highways and city council representatives / employees. TSO employees' TSO was significantly higher than the views of municipalities and highways interviews / representatives. The averages of the NGO platform representatives were higher than those of the city council representatives.