20. yüzyılda yaratıcı kitlesel eylemler ve gündelik hayat estetiği

This study, which examines the relationship between art and daily life through the aesthetic actions spread among the masses on the streets, starting from the historical intersections of rebellion and creativity. Focusing on actuality, forms of mass expression, and social aesthetic pursuits, this study separates the historical relations of theoretical and practical approaches based on their periods and claims that it would include public movements to its subject through questions from daily life. Within the framework of these claims, in the second section of the thesis, aesthetics and dynamics of creative action were researched. The research results of the art and the artist's autonomy processes, which are the propaganda tool of the power and the bourgeoisie, inevitably constitute the basic structure of the study. In the third chapter, with the curiosity about the "History of the Relationship between Social Mobility and Art and Politics", the issues of Collective International Avant-garde Movements, Civil Disobedience, Counterculture, New Action Strategies and Digital Platforms brought this thesis to the subject of "Social Movements and Formations in Turkey After 2000", which is the fourth section. Undoubtedly, although there is no claim of writing based on the formation of a historian, this section at least aims to emphasize how functional aesthetics is in daily life, especially in social mobility since the 1960s. This thesis, which aims to show that many resistances and opposition organizations now prefer aesthetic forms of action over pro-violent actions because they are more functional, hopes to contribute to the peaceful and democratic ways of expressing themselves for new generations to have a more livable, egalitarian and just future.