الرِّسالة السلطانية في سورة الأنعام من تفسير البيضاوي لحاجي حسن زاده (ت: 911ه) دراسةً وتحقيقاً

The purpose of this study is to study and investigate a valuable work of the author, Muhammad bin Mustafa, known as Haji Hassanzadeh, who died in the year 911 AH, one of the scholars of the ninth and tenth centuries AH. The study sheds light on his approach, and what he presented in his message called "Al-Risalah Al-Sultaniyah"; in which he mentioned a lot of various scientific issues belonging to different sciences, such as: hadith, readings, grammar, morphology, and rhetoric, and he quoted explanatory manuscripts, and this is what gave them scientific value. The scope of the study is limited to Surat Al-An'am only, and the copies that were used were two copies: the first is the copy of the Sulaymaniyah Library in Turkey (preserved No. 110), and the second is the copy of Asaad Effendi Library in Turkey (preserved No. 91). To achieve the aim of the study, the steps of the historical descriptive approach were followed in the study section, and the scientific approach used in investigation and commentary: such as copying the manuscript according to the rules of modern writing and comparing copies, proving differences, documenting aphorisms and sayings and attributing them to their sources, as well as removing ambiguity as much as possible. The results of the study were as follows: That Imam Hassanzadeh combined in his interpretation the methods of famous interpreters: such as interpretation by tradition, when he quoted from al-Tabari, and interpretation by opinion by transmission from Imam al-Baydawi, and he adopted the Sufi interpretation by transmitting it from Imam al-Qushayri, as it appeared in the book that he cared for the aspects of language in terms of grammar and rhetoric; In his book, he mentioned the linguistic differences between words and their impact on the meanings, and he mentioned the many syntactic aspects of the words, and he was not satisfied with presenting the grammatical opinions, but he used to give preference to some of them over others. Hasanzadeh inferred questions of interpretation with the sayings of the Companions, followers, and famous scholars, and supported his interpretation with the authentic hadiths of the Prophet. As for the weak ones, they were few, and fabricated hadiths were not mentioned in his book. He also relied on al-Qurtubi in his interpretation in many places without explicit attribution. He also cited many of the opinions of linguists and commented on them without attribution, and this is what he corrects, but that does not negate the fact that his book was rich in sources. Which indicates the diversity and breadth of its culture, and gives its interpretation a scientific value.