Judical review of local authorities

Auditing moves to the standards put forward by the administration and sets out the standards and status of the planned project implemented according to the principles and makes suggestions if there are necessary amendments to existing standards. Main purposes of auditing are to provide information, to prevent faults and abuses and to make rationalism on administration possible.There are some rules that auditing institutions have to do to audit the government organs. Auditing rules are important to provide objectivity, transparency, honesty and to provide confidence on the organs that is audited. There are five essential rules of auditing: honesty, independence, fairness-objectivity-confidence, legal and sufficiency.The topic of the work that is judicial review of local administration is indispensable element of democratic society. Auditing of local administration from Objective and independent institutions determines the level of democracy in a country. For this reason, establishment of local administration, its organs, gaining and losing properties of organs guaranteed under the Constitution.The suitable place to audit the administration by people `s participating in public administration is local administration. The best way to audit the local administration is guardianship auditing. Judicial auditing is for only exceptional cases because decision of judicial authority may cause serious consequences. In addition, people who apply to be pre-determined by the laws of judicial control and as a result of judicial decisions given in advance to be certain more or less show that this auditing is for only exceptional and limited circumstances.Problems that judicial authority struggle a lot are problems of municipalities. There is detailed information about judicial auditing on municipality organs in this study.