Evidences In Administrative Jurisdiction Law In Comparison With Civil Jurisdiction Law

In administrative jurisdiction which is responsible for conflicts between parties and administration, there exists differences from other recourses to judicial in the ways of jurisdiction procedure and evidences that is able to be used.This study is composed of three chapters. In the first chapter the fundemental principles of the administrative juristiction are explained. In the second chapter consept of evidence is studied; evidence systems, features of evidences and ways of accumulating evidences are analysed. In the last chapter, forms of evidences are counted and evidences which are possible to be used in administrative jurisdiction are explained. In the scope of the study; expert, viewing, testimony, oath, document, admission, definitive judgement and learned opinion are considered as the forms of evidence. It ıs discussed whether these evidences are able to be used in administrative jurisdiction. Article 31 of Code of Adminstrative Procedure refers to Code of Civil Procedure for some forms of evidences. For this reason, in the study, differences of evidences between civil jurisdiction and administrative jurisdiction are tried to be explained. Keywords : Administrative jurisdiction, expert, viewing, testimony, oath, document, admission, definitive judgement, learned opinion.