Another critique: Michel Foucault's critical philosophy

Is it possible to interpret Foucaultdian critique as one other than Kant's? This text shows first and foremost that this critique can be interpreted as a "non-Kantian" critique. There are two significant moves in this place: the first one is a critique of anthropological reason, and the other is a Foucauldian perspective on history. This form of critique can be seen as an "ontology of actuality" or "historical ontology of ourselves" rather than a formal ontology of knowledge or analytics of truth. With this critique, we problematize our modes of government and subjectivation. Posing questions on government and subjectivity take us to the centre of our actuality which is shaped by neoliberal rationality that is not just an economic model, but also a manner of thinking, acting, and doing.