Fracture resistances evaluation of four different restorative materials
2003
0 views
0 downloads
Advisor: Prof. Dr. Fatma Atakul
Abstract (EN)
SUMMARY In temporary dentistry, although a range of materials have been used in the restoration of decideous and permanent teeth, amalgam restorations have the first place among them for long time. Since the various disadvantages which amalgam had, it is known that most extensive used materials in the second place are composite resin and glass ionomer restorations. It is generally accepted that materials to be used in the posterior restoration of teeth should present a high fracture resistance. Studies illustrate that many of these materials expose time and economic loss because of their flimsiness to the bite forces. This study was conducted for the purpose of evaluation of the durability to the vertical forces of four different types of restorative materials on the teeth with class II cavities. This in-vitro study was accomplished on the 60 premolar teeth which extracted for periodontal and orthodontic reasons. Teeth which their standard proximal cavities were prepared by fixing them inside the cold acrylic blocs were randomly divided into the four equal groups each of them consist of 15. Restoration process was completed in the Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pedodontics. Having placed the Valux Plus material to the first group, Herculite XRV to the second one, Vitremer to the third one and Chelon Silver to the fourth one, fracture resistance of the restorations was measured by the Testometric micro-500 machine in the laboratory of Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and Trade, Small and Medium Industry Development Organization (KOSGEB-Ankara). Obtained data was assessed statistically by using One Way ANOVA and Post-Hock test. Approximate fracture resistance values were determined as follow: 66,9113 kgf. for Valux Plus, 55,2187 kgf. for Herculite XRV, 51,1493 kgf. for Vitremer and finally, 38,0633 kgf. for Chelon Silver. Among the four different type of restorative substance, it was established that Valux Plus had the highest and Chelon Silver had the lowest fracture resistance.Classification of the fracture resistance values, which was obtained after the statistical analyses, from highest resistance to lower ones is as follow: Valux Plus > Herculite XRV > Vitremer > Chelon Silver (p< 0.001). Key words: Composite resin, Glass ionomer cement, Fracture resistance.
Author
Dr. Emin Caner Tümen
How to Cite
Emin Caner Tümen (Doctorate thesis). Fracture resistances evaluation of four different restorative materials, 2003, Dicle University.
Keywords
License
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
This work is shared under the specified license terms.
More theses from Dicle University
- Dynamic and complexation study of hydroxy amide derivatives with some amine salts by 400 MHz 1H-NMR(2017)
- Serum levels of Interlökin-37 in patients with systemic sclerosis and its' association with clinical parameters(2017)
- Democratic Regions Party municipalities in dilemmas of local services and national politics: as example of Diyarbakır Metropolitan Municipality(2017)
- The practices of municipality and mayoralty from the tanzimat to the present(2017)
- Investigation of cross-transmission dynamics of brucellosis observed in children in the province of Diyarbakir and phylogenetic tree of the brucella isolates(2017)
- The use of ultrasound in the detection of sternum and rib fractures in thoracic trauma patients admitted to the emergency department and comparison with the tomography(2017)
