Comparison of law no. 6183 (Public law) and execution and bankruptcy law (Private law)

Allegations of harassment are one of the most common cases worldwide, given today's economic conditions. For this reason, a lot of laws and lawsuits against the accused cases are found. Precautionary seizure cases are relatively less frequent but less serious cases. In order to link these cases to the result, enforcement and bankruptcy law and Law no. 6183 are utilized. These two laws also lead to interpretive differences in the scope of the binding of the case. In this respect, the scope of the study has included the concept of precautionary foreclosure and the scope of both laws. In the first part of the work, the definition of the precautionary foreclosure concept, its legal resources and legal regulations within the scope of Law No. 6183 are included. In the second part of the study, the concept of precautionary foreclosure was addressed under the Execution and Bankruptcy Law, and the differences and similarities between the two laws were included. In the third and final part of the study, the court case was included and the work was completed.