Montesquieu versus Hume: Origins of national characters
Bu tez size mi ait?
Bu kayıt toplu arşivden geldi. Sizinse profilinize bağlayın.
Özet (EN)
The idea of defining and comparing nations was discussed with modern concepts commonly by Enlightenment philosophers. In this context, Montesquieu and Hume developed ideas on national characters by their own methodologies and philosophical approaches. This research is essentially based on Hume's criticisms of Montesquieu's ideas about the physical causes. Although Montesquieu has been generally mentioned with his climate theory as a defense of political determinism, he devoted the last three parts of The Spirit of the Laws to explain the effectiveness of moral regulations for moderating the laws and manners, and aimed to regulate the French legislative, administrative, and social systems through the moral factors. Furthermore, according to Montesquieu, while physical conditions have a dominant effect on uncivilized societies because of their impacts on the human body, they can be altered through moral factors particularly in modern times. Therefore, although Hume was justifiable in targeting Montesquieu's thoughts on climate in his criticism, it would be incomplete to characterize Montesquieu as a political determinist. Hume, on the other hand, rejected any impact of physical causes on human behaviors in his writings, and as a continuation of his scientific philosophy on human nature and moral psychology, he claimed that moral factors are the only source of national characters. According to Hume, differences in laws and human behaviors are based on different experiences and sharing of sentiments through the principle of sympathy, and any factors other than moral ones cannot affect the minds of people. These differences between their methodological approaches that rooted in the variation of classical and modern teachings form the fundamental distinction between them. Determining the circumstances of France and Britain is crucial to clarify this distinction. In this respect, it is argued in the research that the consequences of the modernization process of France and Britain from the feudal period based on traditional understandings to the eighteenth century through political, intellectual, and socio-economic developments, the revised feudal system of the French monarchy and the modern commercial mixed government of Britain, were influential on the intellectual and methodological thoughts of philosophers.
Yazar
Mehmet Said Kaya
Kurum

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bilim Dalı
Bu Yayına Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Mehmet Said Kaya (Master Thesis). Montesquieu versus Hume: Origins of national characters, 2021, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Lisans
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
Bu eser belirtilen lisans koşulları altında paylaşılmaktadır.
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University tezlerinden daha fazlası
- An investigation the development of remote work in the context of digitalization(2025)
- Investigation of family functionality detected by adolescents with peer bullying(2019)
- An error analysis of c1 level Turkish learner's written compositions(2015)
- Modelling and design of terahertz photoconductive antennas and photomixers(2016)
- Social innovation and Turkey: Potentials, dynamics and the role of the state in promoting socially innovative activities(2017)
- Urban life in Mosul according to the sâlnâmes (1308-1330/1891-1912)(2025)