The comparison of the commentaries based on the order of revelation (At-Tafsîru'l-Hadīth, Fahmu'l-Qur'an al-Hakîm and Beyânu'l-Hak example)

The emergence of the comment of Quran in the order of the Qur'an's revealation as a commentary writing method coincide the second half of the century. Those who adopt this method claim that the Qur'an will be better understood. In this study, the background of the exegesis on the basis of the order of revealation was examined, the at-Tafsîru'l- Hadīth, Fahmu'l-Qur'an al-Hakîm and Beyânu'l-Hak that their commentaries were prepared according to the order of revealation were examined, the method and content were compared with each other. In the first part of our thesis, the history of the commentary, the background of the commentaries were written in the order of revelation and are emphasized on their aims and benefits, the criticisms directed to these examiners are discussed. In the second chapter, the methods, the characteristics, specialities of tafsir, at-Tafsîru'l- Hadīth, Fahmu'l-Qur'an al-Hakîm and Beyânu'l-Hak, were examined. The importance of context in the interpretation of verses and suras is emphasized. In the third chapter, the characteristics of all three tafsir with the narration of verses and verses and their characteristics in terms of the science of Qur'an were examined. The three commentators gave importance to the Qur'anic interpretation with the Qur'an, the commentary of the Qur'an with Sunnah, the Qur'anic commentary by words of the Companions of Moahammed (P.B.U.H) and the companions of the companions of Mohammed (P.B.U.H) and by the reasons of the revelation. The rumors about the reasons of the revelation of the Quran were evaluated according to certain criteria.