Türkiye ve Fas'ta uluslararası göçün yönetişimi: Düzensiz göçmenlerin ülkede kalma hakkına erişimi

This thesis analyses migrant experiences of illegality in Turkey and Morocco by taking into account how both countries responded to increasing pressure by the European Union (EU) to govern irregular migration within their territories. In dialogue with literatures on the legal production of migrant illegality, irregular migrants' subordinate incorporation and political mobilisation by irregular migrants, the thesis provides a multi-layered analysis of migrant illegality. The research aims at revealing the implications of the rising concern with stopping irregular crossings at the EU borders for the wider region and particularly for the people who face such policies and practices. The research is based on the analysis of policy documents and interviews with key stakeholders and migrants of different legal status. It broadly looks at how migrant illegality has been produced by law, practiced and negotiated by the state, by civil society actors and by migrants, themselves. The research focuses on different aspects of migrant illegality, such as experiences of deportability, participation in economic life, access to health care and education and access to legal status to reveal irregular migrants' various incorporation styles and various ways irregular migrants seek access to right to stay. The analysis shows that Morocco has been a case of exclusion at the levels of policy, discourse and practice. Regarding the question of incorporation, Morocco is a crucial case for studying the mobilisation for the rights of irregular migrants. Despite abuses and discrimination, irregular migrants have been subject to day-to-day legitimacy, particularly through their labour market participation in the case of Turkey. However, de facto recognition of the presence of irregular migrants was not coupled with an inclusive pro-migrant rights movement.