Evaluation of the medical malpractice cases concluded in supreme court of appeals between 2010-2017
2018
0 görüntülenme
0 i̇ndirme
Danışman: Prof. Dr. Necmi Çekin
Özet (EN)
Aim: There is a substantial increase in medical malpractice cases in our country as well as in the whole world. Health care professionals are sentenced to pay compensation in high amounts and penal sanctions. It is aimed to reveal the cases considered as defects and situations that can be considered as occupational risky for not harming patients, to guide in diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, to provide a clear explanation of the complaints of medical personnel and to contribute to the elimination of these problems in practice by examination of decisions of Supreme Court of Appeals, which is the ultimate decisionmaking authority in court proceedings. Material and Method: In our study, 508 decisions of Supreme Court of Appeals decisions we get access between 2010-2017 that are in accordance with the conditions we have set for our study have been examined. Results: It was determined that 81% of the health care workers complained of the claim of medical malpractice were physicians, the most frequent complaints about obstetrician and gynecologist, and emergency physicians according to specialties, most of the complainants were working in private hospitals / clinics, health care professionals were most often complained of treatment failure and indifference / carelessness, 43% of the cases referred to hospitals in emergency conditions, the most performed medical procedure in the cases was surgical intervention, 20.7% of health care professionals in civil suit and 27.4% of health care professionals in criminal suit were penalised by the local courts, 79% of the court decisions were reversed by the Supreme Court of Appeals, and the reason for the deterioration was mostly stated that the expert report was incomplete / insufficient, 30.8% of the expert reports stated that health care proffesionals were defective, these experts' reports have pointed out that the mistakes concentrate on 'lack of necessary consultation', 'incomplete and imprecise treatment', 'imperfect medical treatment' and 'lack of follow-up on therapy'. Conclusion: In order to minimize malpractice claims, health care professionals should develop their professional knowledge and experience and establish good communication with the patient. In addition, there is a need for a medical malpractice law detailing the concepts of defects and complications, where measures are taken for healthcare professionals instead of criminal measures.
Yazar
Dr. Mustafa Kırtışoğlu
Bu Yayına Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Mustafa Kırtışoğlu (Medical Specialty Thesis). Evaluation of the medical malpractice cases concluded in supreme court of appeals between 2010-2017, 2018, Çukurova University.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Lisans
Tüm Hakları Saklıdır
Bu eser belirtilen lisans koşulları altında paylaşılmaktadır.
Çukurova University tezlerinden daha fazlası
- Role of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) in ındicating the over reserve of IVF Patients(2011)
- Credit risk management in banking sector: An application of variables determining credit risk in Turkish banking sector(2011)
- Comparasion of the shear bond strength of two different precoated and uncoated ceramic brackets(2014)
- The control tests of four anode photomultiplier tubes for hf calorimeter of CMS detector(2014)
- The predictive strength of career decision making difficulties on high school students' career maturity accordi̇ng to their levels of focus of control(2017)
- The relationship between SCUBE1 level electrocardiography echocardiography findings, epicardial fat tissue, and carotid intima media thickness in patients receiving renal replacement therapy(2017)
