حاشية دده عمر روشني ضياء الدين الآيديني (ت.892ه) على تفسير البيضاوي من أول سورة هود إلى آخر سورة النحل (دراسة وتحقيقاً)

This study included the footnote(Hashiya) of Deddeh Omar Roshni Diaa al-Din al-Aydini (d. 892 AH) on the interpretation of al-Baydawi, and its scope is determined from Surat Hud to Surat Al-Nahl. The value of this Hashiya comes from the importance of the unique explanations and comments made by the author during his investigation the book of Imam al-Baydawi, providing answers to these problems, discussion of them, and statement of correctness, In addition to the useful linguistic, jurisprudential and rhetorical issues mentioned in this footnote, in which the commentator mentioned the controversial issues and then followed by mentioning the most correct opinion. In addition to the fact that this footnote reflects the scientific activity in the Ottoman era. The study followed the historical descriptive approach in This is when translating the imam Sheikh Deddeh Omar Al-Aydini, and introducing their biographical and scholarly biographies, while the scientific method used in the investigation and commentary on the book: such as writing the text, justify the text with diacritics, comparing the copies, attributing the sayings, and extracting the issues and documenting them. The most prominent findings of the study: The Hashiya of Deddeh Omar combined the three types of Quran interpretation: by tradion, opinion, and Sufi interpretation. It highlighted the quality of the scientific method followed by the author in explanation, inference, and citation. His book included nice comments and explanations, which made his Hashiya clearer. Al-Aydini's selection of Al-Baydawi's texts was not by a specific methodology, nor were his comments in one field. Rather, it dealt with various issues, but most of them were linguistic in the fields of grammar and rhetoric. Imam Dedah Omar distinguished himself in rejecting many of the weak exegetical opinions that are not based on reliable evidence, so he relied on the weighting of the Qur'an, hadith, language, and other things according to what the evidence requires, also, in his explanation, he was comparing Imam Al-Baydawi with other