Comparative analysis of voting preferences: National Outlook Movement, Justice and Development Party

The National Vision Movement became politicized with the establishment of the National Order Party in 1970. The parties of the movement were closed many times as a result of coups and closure cases on the grounds that they were anti-secular. The Justice and Development Party, which was founded in 2002, was founded by the names trained in this movement. This party, by declaring that it is not affiliated with the National Vision Tradition, differentiated itself from its opponents with its conservative democracy identity and managed to maintain its power from the first elections it participated in. The research compares the voter preferences of Welfare Party, Virtue Party and Justice and Development Party. In the study, in which party programs, election declarations, discourse and actions of deputies are examined comparatively, the National Vision Movement Parties have compromised their values due to the innovative staff and the fear of being shut down. However, it was concluded that the constant values remained constant despite everything. During the Welfare Party period, the party reached a mass of voters other than the bone voters with the rhetoric of Fair Economic Order. On the other hand, the Justice and Development Party, thanks to the lessons it learned from the National Vision Movement, eliminated the actors that could pose a risk and renewed its election strategy in order not to fall below a certain percentage of votes in each election period.