Master'sOpen Access

Safety risk in automotive service, the comparison of measures and risk analysis

Is this your thesis?

This record came from a bulk archive import. If it’s yours, link it to your profile.

2016
0 views
0 downloads

Abstract (EN)

This study; published in the Official Journal No. 28339 on June 30 2012 Occupational Health and Safety Act is located in, covers employees and all employees are required to comply with health and safety standards. The occupational safety began in the automotive repair industry with the invention of the automobile, 'workplace scheme, workshop layout, fire, workplace conditions, the environment, used machinery equipment, training of employees, risk assessment and personal protection' was examined under the subject headings. The L Matris and Failure Modular and Effects Analysis(FMEA)–Risk Assessment Methods, comparised and the results listed below; 1. In the L Matris there are "probibability" and "Intensity" for risky situations. In the FMEA possible error causes and their effects is more important. 2. In the L Matris while the group work doesn't require much experience, in the FMEA requires well experienced group members. 3. Variable terms of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis is requires more data. 4. Failure Mode and Effect Analysis have been reported to work with a quality system compliant with L matrix method can be studied independently.

Author

Esma Baykan

How to Cite

Esma Baykan (Master Thesis). Safety risk in automotive service, the comparison of measures and risk analysis, 2016, İstanbul Aydın University.

License

Tüm Hakları Saklıdır

This work is shared under the specified license terms.

More theses from İstanbul Aydın University